This would in fact not a problem with this structure; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn spouse off Malise

Regarding Comyn child who had been partner regarding Malise out of Strathearn, I experienced theorized during the 2005 one she were Margaret, defined as spouse off Sir John de- Keith (look for duplicate of blog post less than) who was simply 2ndly age are given in that blog post: new partner Emma I would suggest are of another family relations, and never mother of your next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl from Buchan_ , says partly, ‘Malise, Earl away from Strathearn, had a partner Emma, during the 1261-1267, whoever surname are unknown ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a bit ahead of 1270, so his widow (Margaret) could have been “available” some time once Emma.

This was obviously a conjecture; it will feel the benefit of coping with a known matchmaking ranging from Muriel Keith and you will Reginald ce Cheyne. Any longer relevant files do without a doubt getting greeting.

The fresh new membership from inside the Scots Peerage regarding the group of Keith claims away from Sir John de Keith (d. ca. 1270) he try believed to has partnered Comyn, earl from Buchan . It personality, of the not sure (“said to have been”) assortment, can now feel fixed according to the adopting the dispensation, dated within Fondi for the fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 To the bishop regarding Moray view website. Faculty so you can dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, regarding Moray and you may Aberdeen dioceses, throughout the impediment to wedding as a result of the third and you will next levels of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long run next partner away from Robert Stewart, initially Duke regarding Albany (d. 1420), is actually developed so you’re able to marry Reginald ce Cheyne, child out of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne of the his spouse (while the their own first husband), Helen away from Strathearn. Whenever you are there are renowned gaps in the origins out-of Muriel Keith, she and you can Reginald le Cheyne do express a lineage on the Comyns. But not, that is as well distant to need a great dispensation if the Muriel was a-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1233), which may become instance in the event that ‘s the reason daughter.

dos. Reginald le Cheyne are a great-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child away from Alexander Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1290), son of William Comyn mentioned above. Their unique child was Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn away from 1312 in order to their passing during the 1328 , and dad out-of Reginald.

california. 1270), try same as Marjory Comyn, and you can partnered 2ndly to help you Malise, Earl away from Strathearn (d. 1312). This should mean new parentage a€?considered enjoys been’ that Margaret, wife regarding Sir John de- Keith, try away from that generation: she’d n’t have come the d Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, but rather out-of his son Alexander. There’s absolutely no research you to definitely Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn have been hitched much ahead of 1275: because Lindsay penned,

There was you to definitely discernable foundation about what the relationship ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you will Muriel Keith might have stayed: if Margaret Comyn, partner out of Sir John de Keith (d

‘ This new partner on the earl, regarding the 1275, try titled Marjory, as we see the attesting clause off No. cv., that’s stated of the Wyntoun, Book VIII. guy. vi., to possess been next sis of John Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, just who discussed on behalf of Earl Malise the marriage settlement a lot more than said [old during the London area, April 26, 1293 to own his child Matilda and you will Robert de- Tony, young buck away from Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de Quincy Elizabeth off Buchan I __________________I________________ I III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als We E from Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I We I I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de Keith E regarding = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I We We I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E regarding Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We ce Cheyne We We I = 2) Sir David We V I We de Graham Sir William de- We I__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I I We III We We I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke off Albany)

Categorised in: apps free

This post was written by vladeta